Whiplash and neck injuries are common outcomes of car accidents and other incidents leading to personal injury claims in New York City and its surrounding areas, including Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, The Bronx, Nassau County, and Suffolk County. These injuries can vary significantly in severity, impacting a person's quality of life from mild discomfort to debilitating pain requiring extensive medical intervention. For residents in these areas, understanding how these injuries are evaluated and compensated is crucial when seeking justice and financial recovery.
What Is Whiplash?
Whiplash is a neck injury resulting from a rapid back-and-forth movement of the neck, similar to the cracking of a whip. This sudden motion can strain or tear the muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the neck. Common symptoms include:
Neck Pain and Stiffness
Headaches
Dizziness
Fatigue
Blurred Vision
Whiplash often occurs in automobile accidents, particularly rear-end collisions on busy New York roads like the FDR Drive or intersections throughout Brooklyn and Queens. It can also result from sports injuries and physical assaults.
Factors Affecting Compensation in New York
Compensation for whiplash and neck injuries in New York personal injury cases depends on several factors:
Severity of the Injury: More severe injuries with long-term effects typically receive higher compensation.
Medical Expenses: Costs for treatments, surgeries, therapy, and medications are considered.
Lost Wages: Compensation for time missed from work due to the injury.
Pain and Suffering: Non-economic damages for physical pain and emotional distress.
Comparative Negligence: If the victim is partially at fault, compensation may be reduced.
Legal Considerations in New York
In New York, specific legal considerations influence personal injury litigation involving whiplash and neck injuries:
Statute of Limitations: Victims have three years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.
No-Fault Insurance: New York's no-fault system covers initial medical expenses regardless of fault.
Serious Injury Threshold: To sue in a car accident, the injury must meet the "serious injury" threshold under New York Insurance Law Section 5102(d). You should consult with an attorney to determine if your injuries meet the “serious injury threshold.”
Recent New York Judgments and Settlements
Examining real-world cases from Manhattan, Brooklyn, The Bronx, and other parts of New York provides valuable insight into how whiplash and neck injuries are valued in personal injury litigation.
Case 1: Stanford v. Ridgeway Corp. (2018)
On December 17, 2011, Ebony Stanford, a 33-year-old security officer at Harlem Hospital residing in The Bronx, was a rear-seat passenger in a taxicab involved in a collision on the FDR Drive near the 53rd Street exit in Manhattan. The accident caused Ms. Stanford to experience immediate back and neck pain from whiplash.
She was transported by ambulance to the hospital with a neck brace and released after five hours. Her injuries included bulging discs at L4-5 and L5-S1. She underwent three spinal manipulations under anesthesia and received chiropractic and physical therapy for four months. Despite treatment, she continued to experience pain that prevented her from lifting her six-year-old daughter, carrying heavy groceries, or walking quickly.
In her lawsuit, Ms. Stanford sought compensation for pain and suffering and lost wages. The jury awarded her $14,400 for past loss of earnings but no compensation for pain and suffering. The decision was upheld on appeal, with the appellate court noting that her evidence was not compelling regarding the severity of her injuries. This case highlights the challenges in proving the seriousness of whiplash injuries under New York law.
Case 2: Kusulas v. Saco (2015)
On February 23, 2006, Suzanne Kusulas, a 40-year-old resident of Brooklyn, was a front-seat passenger in her boyfriend's car, stopped at a red light on 16th Street at its intersection with Prospect Park West. Their vehicle was violently rear-ended, causing Ms. Kusulas to be thrust back and forth, striking her head on the dashboard.
Following the accident, she experienced significant neck pain and underwent conservative treatment for 20 months, including physical therapy and steroid injections. When her condition did not improve, she underwent her first surgery: an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at C4-5 and C5-6. Despite the surgery, she continued to experience unremitting neck pain due to a non-union from the first surgery and a new disc herniation at C6-7. A second surgery—a three-level posterior cervical fusion from C4-C7—was performed.
Ms. Kusulas suffered from chronic neck pain, almost a 50% permanent loss of range of motion, and was unable to resume activities like biking, canoeing, and exercising. The jury awarded her $2,000,000 for pain and suffering ($1,000,000 past and $1,000,000 future). The award was affirmed on appeal, reflecting the severe impact of her whiplash injury and subsequent complications.
Case 3: Chery v. Souffrant (2010)
On July 24, 2006, Marie Chery, a 55-year-old factory worker and Haitian immigrant residing in Spring Valley, NY, was stopped in her car when rear-ended by a vehicle traveling at approximately 25 mph. Ms. Chery's head struck the headrest, and she briefly lost consciousness.
She was transported to the hospital, diagnosed with a herniated disc at L4-5, and underwent physical therapy, chiropractic treatment, and massage therapy. Unable to work for exactly 90 days, she also could not engage in activities like singing in her church choir or performing household chores. After 90 days, she returned to work with some limitations.
In her lawsuit, the jury awarded her $50,000 for past pain and suffering under the "90/180" category of the serious injury threshold. The award was upheld on appeal, illustrating how whiplash injuries that temporarily disrupt daily activities can result in modest compensation when statutory thresholds are met.
Case 4: Zgrodek v. McInerney (2009)
Mr. Zgrodek sustained significant neck and back injuries requiring surgery. The defendant conceded liability, but the contention was whether the injuries met the serious injury threshold. The jury found that his injuries constituted a significant limitation of use but awarded no damages for pain and suffering.
On appeal, the court found the verdict inconsistent and ordered a new trial to determine reasonable compensation for his pain and suffering. This case demonstrates how appellate courts can correct inconsistencies to ensure fair compensation when whiplash-related injuries meet statutory thresholds.
Case 5: Sanz v. MTA-Long Island Bus (2007)
On August 12, 2002, Tracey Sanz, a passenger on a bus owned by MTA-Long Island Bus, was involved in an accident when the bus was struck by another bus. Ms. Sanz claimed that she suffered herniated discs in her cervical spine and numbness and tingling in both hands—consistent with severe whiplash injuries.
Approximately one month after the accident, she underwent an anterior cervical discectomy with an allograft and plate fusion. The defense argued that her injuries resulted from a prior accident in January 1994. However, her internist testified that just one week before the accident, during a routine physical, she exhibited full cervical range of motion and no spinal tenderness.
Her treating physician explained that the large extruded disc fragment found in her cervical spine was the result of an acute episode typically following a whiplash-type injury. The jury awarded Ms. Sanz $350,000 for past pain and suffering and $400,000 for future pain and suffering. On appeal, the awards were reduced to $200,000 for past pain and suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering, aligning with reasonable compensation standards.
Conclusion
Whiplash and neck injuries can lead to a wide range of outcomes in personal injury litigation across New York City and Long Island, depending on the severity of the injuries, their impact on the plaintiff's life, and the quality of medical and legal evidence presented.
These cases demonstrate that compensation for whiplash and neck injuries can vary significantly, ranging from no award to multi-million-dollar settlements. The dollar amounts span from $0 to $2,000,000 for pain and suffering damages alone. This variability underscores the importance of:
Thorough Medical Documentation: Comprehensive records and expert testimony are crucial.
Meeting Legal Thresholds: Understanding and satisfying New York's serious injury criteria.
Impact on Daily Life: Demonstrating how injuries affect employment and activities.
Effective Legal Representation: Experienced attorneys can navigate complex laws and advocate effectively.
For residents of Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, The Bronx, Nassau County, and Suffolk County who have suffered whiplash or neck injuries:
Seek Immediate Medical Attention: Early diagnosis and treatment are vital.
Adhere to Treatment Plans: Consistent care demonstrates ongoing impact.
Consult a Qualified Personal Injury Attorney in New York: Legal expertise is essential for navigating state-specific laws and maximizing compensation.
By taking these steps, victims can better position themselves to secure compensation that reflects the true extent of their injuries and losses.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Although I am an attorney, I am not your attorney, and reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and legal interpretations can vary by jurisdiction and over time. For advice pertaining to your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your area.
Comments